Day 1: Dangerous of Digital Native Label
Over the course of today, I spent a significant
amount of time diving into the term "digital native." The terminology
digital native is derived from the works of John Perry Barlow and Rushkoff.
However, the term was made popular and coined by Marc Prensky is his work,
“Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants.” Marc Prensky argues that digital natives
are individuals born after 1980 who were raised in a society in which digital
technology was an essential and assimilated aspect into daily life. Those who
were not raised in a society centered on digital technology are considered digital
immigrants. Although digital immigrants can become tech savvy, Marc Prensky
would argue that they interact and think about digital technology in a
different way than digital natives.
After discussing Marc Prensky in class, I would
agree with his thought that society has evolved over the course of history to
be more centered on digital technology. It is simply impossible to deny that
our society thrives and depends on digital technology. However, I would agree
with Boyd that there is danger in labeling and dividing individuals based on
how they interact with technology based on the technology that was available to
them at birth. I think it is dangerous
to place labels on individuals because technology is constantly evolving at
such a rapid pace. The video below gives a quick glance as to how fast society
is growing and changing. Therefore, the technology that is available to
“digital natives” now will not always be at the forefront of society. There
will always be new technology that individuals will either interact with from
birth or need to learn and acquire as they grow up.
I would also agree with Boyd that
there is a second danger of labeling individuals as “digital natives.” By
labeling people as “digital natives” a false assumption is often created
amongst society that scholars know how to both produce and consume digital
information. However, this is simply not reality. Although students are constantly producing
information in the digital world via Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, etc, I
believe students do not have the ability to critically think about what they
are consuming. In a society where information is constantly at students’
fingertips, teachers need to no longer teach content, but instead must change
their instruction to teach students to analyze and critically think about what
they are reading, watching, and viewing.
There is no doubt that society is evolving at rapid speed, but
will the educational system learn to adapt and change to meet the new needs of
today’s students?
To check out more of my thoughts I have previously written on another blog visit: Evolving Mindsets In An Evolving Society
I also found myself agreeing with Boyd that we need to be careful in labeling students as "digital natives" since we do not know how digitally literate they are. When we then delve into what they are producing, we want to be aware of the quality of what they are producing and if they are actually understanding and making connections with other pieces of information they have come upon.
ReplyDeleteYounger students may not yet possess the critical thinking skills necessary to sift the content of the internet- that's certain. Another disturbing trend I see is the propensity for children and adults to stay in social media "echo chambers", seeking out and paying attention to content that echoes their own tastes, points of view, opinions. To me, that's very dangerous. Nobody grows in an echo chamber.
ReplyDelete